Spontaneous brain microbleeds: systematic review, subgroup analyses and standards for study design and reporting
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Spontaneous brain microbleeds: systematic review, subgroup analyses and standards for study design and reporting.
Brain microbleeds (BMBs) are seen as small, homogeneous, round foci of low signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging gradient echo (GRE) T2 sequences. BMBs might only be a biomarker for microangiopathy, or alternatively BMBs might provide useful diagnostic and prognostic information, potentially with therapeutic implications for the treatment of stroke. Because of the rapid expansion in re...
متن کاملThe influence of study characteristics on reporting of subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: systematic review.
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of industry funding on reporting of subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Medline. STUDY SELECTION Randomised controlled trials published in 118 core clinical journals (defined by the National Library of Medicine) in 2007. 1140 study reports in a 1:1 ratio by high (five general medicine journals with l...
متن کاملStandards for Reporting Qualitative Research
سخن سردبیر Editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره هجدهم، آذر 1398، 860-859 استاندارد‌هایی برای گزارش پژوهشهای کیفی Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research محسن رضائیان[1] M. Rezaeian تاکنون در مجله علمی دانشگاه، مقالات گوناگونی در خصوص استاندارد‌های تدوین شده برای گزارش شفاف پژوهشهای کمّی و از جمله کارآزمایی‌‌های بالینی [1] و مطالعات مشاهده‌ای اپیدمیو...
متن کاملA systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal experiments with guidelines for reporting.
To maximize the findings of animal experiments to inform likely health effects in humans, a thorough review and evaluation of the animal evidence is required. Systematic reviews and, where appropriate, meta-analyses have great potential in facilitating such an evaluation, making efficient use of the animal evidence while minimizing possible sources of bias. The extent to which systematic review...
متن کاملRecommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review
BACKGROUND This study is to perform a systematic review of existing guidance on quality of reporting and methodology for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) in order to compile a list of potential items that might be included in a reporting guideline for such reviews: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA). ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Brain
سال: 2007
ISSN: 0006-8950,1460-2156
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awl387